Eric Mill over at Mill Industries has some interesting things to say about Google Buzz. Mostly it seems that he's not counting it out yet, despite the rampant privacy concerns and general sense that Google has intruded on people's sacred inbox space. The reason is because of comments by DeWitt Clinton, a Google developer.
I'll let you read now....
...
Back? Okay so basically DeWitt talks about this Internet Utopia where the whole web is one big social network and you can follow a friend/twitter like feed from any application that supports it. Turning friend feeds into email. Google Buzz has already decided that if your friend feed is as federated and easy as email, why not show it next to your email? For many people that should have been the final step, but if Google's coercion got more people on the playground then I don't really care.
But I do have a few questions. Like if someone leaves a comment on something in my Google Buzz, how do I see it in my Yahoo! Hum? I supposed the sites would have to be 'connected', which basically means that my Hum would have to subscribe to the pubsubhubbub feed of my Google Buzz.
But as far as the comment goes, we can't just import the names of the people, "Joey Shoad" and the like. Then we'd be facing the same supposed 'privacy concerns' as were created by the launch of Buzz. Actually, I totally think we should just show the guy's full name because he should have known that he was posting a public comment in a public form on a public post. But Joey could get mad about this. So as a compromise, I guess you'd have to md5 his email and get 'HanZ972oF0F...@GoogleBuzz' which could be shown to the user as "Travis' Friend", with each friend in a different color to help with threaded comments. Then, if you're subscribed to my Yahoo! Hum and you also know Joey by email, you'll see his full name.
Are there going to be pubsubhubbub nodes out there that represent groups and interests? If so, I think we should drop the word 'subscribe' and allow users to 'follow' these nodes. It's simply a less scary word...though I could see using 'connect' to, and treating the node as a site. But that would muddy the metaphor that sites you connect with share YOUR data. Anyways, would public nodes have options for joining? Twitter simply becomes the biggest friend feed pubhubsubbub aggregator. Of course, it's going to be up to the application to filter out redundant messages. Do Buzz posts have UUIDs?
Yeah, I'm not going to wrap this post up. Cheers!
I read your shitty blog. Stop calling me "no one".