WTF Sandwich
Quote of the Moment Edit this quote!
Posted by T-$ :: Mar 28 2006 at 11:59

Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

--Thomas Edison

You are viewing a specific, possibly very old post. Most likely, you got here from a search engine, or maybe from the RSS feed — which, quite lazily, always lists the ten most recent posts no matter how old they actually are.

Wired is telling me to ditch my blog. Their argument is that Facebook and Flickr make it easier to do what I'm doing with my blog anyways. Now, I was never on the cutting edge of blogging. I didn't even have my livejournal until my junior year of college, which was 2002...about the middle of the bell curve for blogging 'taking off' and ancient history if I was really trying to be emo about things.

Now I'm not even the top result for "travis briggs" in Google, a statistic I prided myself on forever.

And why should I bother watching the World Series? I love watching the Red Sox, but I loathe watching other teams play. Especially when one of the teams is from the National League, a league that I spend the entire regular season ignoring. I'm simply not familiar with the players....not to mention that Fox coverage of baseball is only slightly above TBS's. Nothing beats the local broadcasters for local coverage of a baseball game.

But I'm probably just bitter because I don't have any friends to go to a bar and watch the game with...

flame bait
Posted by spavis :: Oct 23 2008 at 16:30

I've heard a lot of blogs refer to that article as flame bait. maybe going blogless works for some people but there's no killer combination of apps that'll completely replace the blog. ...yet

wired just wants the trackbacks. WHORES!

Add a comment!

There was a day in August, around the time of the 2008 Democratic National Convention, when I was approached by a man while we were both riding Boston's blue line. At the moment he approached me, I had been casually yet enthusiastically discussing some of the things about the convention- and, of course, Barack Obama's candidacy- that had me particularly excited.

The man had a worn face, and was wearing work clothes - a dirty hoody and scuffed jeans. It was clear he was a hard working man, presumably a member of the 'working class' that I keep hearing about. He approached me courteously yet assertively and asked simply "Do you think Obama can win it?"

I was secretly delighted to have a soapbox thus thrust underneath me. I first answered a resounding "YES!" to the man's leading question. The follow-up was the expected: "Why?" For that answer, I recall briefly and enthusiastically talking about minimum wage and health care, and how Barack Obama not only supports raising the levels of both, but has specific, well thought-out plans for doing so.

I hurriedly left the train at my stop, shaking the man's hand, surrounded by the grunts of approval and some disapproval of the patrons around me. It was an altogether electrifying moment, and it made me think "Yes, I could be a part of politics" and "Yes, I could do canvassing".

Since then I've lost a lot of enthusiasm for the campaign. It seems the television ads and the debates have boiled the Obama campaign, for me, down to a bunch of 'talking points'. And although I can recite many of them, I don't feel passionate about any of them. Obama is still my candidate, and I'm still going to vote for him if at all possible. But I'm not considering joining the Democratic party as much as I was a couple months ago. <sad_face/>

..
Posted by Eric Mill :: Oct 19 2008 at 10:05

Talking points and "messaging" are dehumanizing and dispiriting, and I share your complete lack of enthusiasm for them. But, I try to think of it as something that's not aimed at me, or you. Those talking points are for people who aren't already so convinced that they're shaking hands with people on the subway about it.

For people who have come this far and have yet to be convinced, they are either a.) researching the candidates on their own and in detail, making messaging less useful, or b.) are completely apathetic. And I don't know of *any* effective strategy to get through to people in class (b) - I guess talking points are the most effective, at least traditionally.

My point is not to pay attention to talking points anyway, because the campaign isn't trying to oversimplify themselves for you - they know that you already understand them in the complete and complex way that 30some% of the country does, Barack's unchangeable rock of support. The talking points are for somebody else.

Add a comment!

Dear boxoffail,

Thank you for performing an anonymous, unrequested security audit of my personal blog website. I appreciate the obvious thought and effort that went into your test cases/attack scenarios.

In the future, we would appreciate it if you contacted us in advance before performing any such audits. Although we here at boxofmonocles.com consider the security of our website and our customers' private data our highest priority, random, unannounced testing such as this is neither welcome nor helpful. As an esteemed member of the online security community yourself, I'm sure you understand that these sorts of activities, even when conducted in a "white hat" manner, can undermine our own security practices. Furthermore, your queries look strange and confusing to our legitimate users, and may give the false impression that we have been 'spammed' or 'compromised', even when no such breach has occurred.

We will further address this issue in the coming days.

Sincerely,
The boxofmonocles.com Security Team

Thanks guys, I couldn't agree more
Posted by T-$ :: Aug 29 2008 at 01:54

In addition to the points of ethics, pragmatism and basic courtesy that you brought up, I just wanted to point out that activities such as these may run afoul of anti-hacking laws in your jurisdiction.

Read all about it at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11470

...

And one more thing, on a more personal note. Box of fail, whoever the fuck you are [but I think that you're probably LW or BS from BC and I totally love and respect you guys with all my heart (aka, this post and this comment are both completely in good fun), similar to your 'security audit'. I wont DDoS you if you don't me. Besides, your servers are probably bigger :)], don't think I didn't realize that you were a real person and try to attribute this to 'zombie PCs in consumer households'. I know damn well that NO COMPUTER IN EXISTENCE (except maybe Deep Thought) could crack my CAPTCHAo'DOOM(tm). Clearly you're ONE SINGLE pimply, unemployed, Star Trek fan living in your parents' basement. Leave my website alone, bitches!


Add a comment!

Internet Trolls....now available in hardcover!

A few days ago the 24-hour mainstream news networks seem to have decided that it was the correct day to discuss the new Jerome Corsi book, The Obama Nation. Presumably, this was prompted by the near laughably warm reception Corsi received from Sean Hannity on his television and radio programs that day. I wonder if Sean Hannity ever realizes that his public persona is a caricature as ridiculous as that of Stephen Colbert.

Anyways, I found out quickly that the book was simply a political attack book, and found out that it had reached New York Times #1 bestseller status within two weeks of its release. At first, I assumed this was simply a sad reflection of the American appetite for sensationalism. But later, I learned that the New York Times was reporting "bulk sales" as a contributor to this apparent success. Without getting out my tinfoil hat, I think it's reasonable to believe that so-called right wing 'think tanks' are buying the book in large numbers simply to inflate the best-seller numbers. People are then susceptible to statements such as "...according to the #1 bestseller", and may confuse notability with creditability.

Obama has released his lengthy criticism, Unfit For Publication, in PDF format. Good for him. After Abigail let me read her copy of Al Franken's now-slightly-dated Lies (And the Lying Liars Who Tell Them), I realized what wimps the Democrats had been for letting people like Corsi and Hannity get away with their hateful attack politics. I'm glad to see that Obama won't necessarily stand for this kind of crap.

Unfortunately, the Wikipedia article for this book isn't fairing particularly well. When I first visited it last week, it seemed like an evenhanded discussion of the book's content, as well as some well cited criticism of its allegations. I was particularly impressed by the talk page where, although disputes had arisen, they had been discussed and resolved in a civilized manner. But now, not even a week later, the article is under protection because of edit warring. And the talk page is an unapproachable mess of the same tired allegations, over and over again, along with an alphabet soup of Wikipedia policy appeals (WP:RS, WP:BLP, WP:SOAP, etc...). I'm starting to believe that some people simply have an agenda, and aren't particularly interested in creating a neutral, accurate, freely-accessible reference work.

Anyone interested in an unbiased treatment of the subject is likely to be disappointed. And maybe that's the point. Maybe that's Corsi's real objective in publishing a book like this. An Orwellian attempt not to create debate, but to destroy it in a trivial shouting match of allegations. Corsi has stated that "voters can make up their own minds." I can't help but wonder if Corsi hopes that the electorate will do so in lieu of seeking out researched and established facts.

Add a comment!

Someone needs to invent a simple word/phrase that means "wow, this is my first blog post in a while..."

Anyways: I left Pawtucket, RI at about 9 AM EDT Friday morning, and journeyed to beautiful Chicago, Illinois. The trip was hellish; the combination of layovers, delays and 'missed flights' (apparently you can't arrive at 11:20 for a 12:05 flight) caused me to arrive at Chicago Midway at 9 PM CDT.

Despite that, my trip has been absolutely awesome. I've been staying with my friend Sarah, and I've managed to attend a Red Sox game, which they won 6-2, and go to the top of the Hancock Building/Tower/Center (I'm not sure which is the official name...). It actually kind of creeped me out that there is a giant Hancock building in both Boston and Chicago.

Tonight I went to a couple of blues clubs that were in walking distance from Sarah's apartment. I had an amazing time. One cover charge grants you admission to both clubs on Sunday, which was completely serendipitous from my point of view. I met a few bona-fide blues musicians who were hanging out at the clubs on their off days (aka non-performing-days), as well as a couple from Kentucky and a couple from the UK. None of which would have been at all worthwhile if the music had not been absolutely wonderful! Seriously better than anything I've heard in Boston, and I've gone to some authentic blues clubs/nights in Boston.

One thing that sort of caught me by surprise this trip was finding out that I had happened to arrive exactly in time for Terminus, a Harry Potter convention that I had first learned about on 07/20/07 while wandering around what had become "Hogwart's Square". I was discussing my fandom with some folks when I was given a promotional pin and an invitation to invite. "Yikes," I thought, "A Harry Potter convention, and more than a year away. I can't imagine I'll be attending." And I was right, I only actually heard about the conference again through a local news station I happened to be watching, and then only after it had, ahem, terminated.

All in all, my trip was fun and exciting, and probably exactly what I needed to help me climb out of the 'funk' that I've been in the past couple weeks. Thanks again to Sarah, who was a gracious and welcoming host.

..
Posted by Eric Mill :: Aug 15 2008 at 19:37

That's an awesome trip. Each time I've been out to Chicago I've come back more in love with the place, too. Great city. Though hey, if you have any Boston club recommendations, pass them my way; I'll have to find something to do on my spare time...

Add a comment!

Friend of a Friend Creative Commons License

This blog and all of its original content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike2.5 License. All other content is made available under the Fair Use laws of the United States of America.

Email Travis Briggs via whispr.