WTF Sandwich
Quote of the Moment Edit this quote!
Posted by Sheila Dugan :: May 08 2006 at 15:54

"I wanted Bush to go, it'll be a long four more
Unless he pass a bill, to legalize this pimpin
Or let that dope come through without the feds interferrin' "

--B.G. in ""Fool With It""

You are viewing a specific, possibly very old post. Most likely, you got here from a search engine, or maybe from the RSS feed — which, quite lazily, always lists the ten most recent posts no matter how old they actually are.

I watched Barack Obama become the 44th President of the United States last night.

And I must admit, I cried.

It was to be expected, seeing as I cried during the Democratic National Convention (multiple times) and cried after casting my vote on the walk home. I feel so inspired by this man! I am an optimist; I believe that people are inherently good and want to do the right thing. The fact that we might finally be getting away from all of the fear and division of the past 8 years is exciting. The fact that we might be able to help the millions of people around America who are having a difficult time economically or with their health care is uplifting. And the fact that we have a new leader who truly believes in himself and more importantly in us is enough to, quite frankly, make me cry.

Besides, who wouldn't be taken in by that puppy comment. I mean come'on!

..
Posted by Eric Mill :: Nov 07 2008 at 23:58

Ah man, you better believe I cried. So did many of us in the office watching it projected on the screen. So moving. These are good days. Don't forget to visit change.gov and have your mind a little blown.

Add a comment!

The next two things I want to blog about both come directly from things I saw on Facebook.

First, everyone knows that Sarah Palin has mediocre intellect and extremely poor public speaking skills. These facts are made more apparent by her statement that media criticism of her amounts to a violation of her First Amendment rights. We are left to wonder, has she read the First Amendment. It starts with "Congress shall make no law..." (I didn't look it up, but will be mighty embarrassed if I was wrong) and goes on to list a whole bunch of things Congress can't make laws about, like freedom of speech, the press, religion and assembly. I would reallly hope that intellectually mature and especially educated individuals are past the point of thinking that freedom of speech means the right to say whatever one wants whenever and wherever one wants. The governor clearly doesn't know any better. In fact, I would offer that the kind of media criticism she has come under for her 'Obama?=?Terrorist' comments is EXACTLY the discussion of public political figures that the First Amendment was put in place to engender.

Also, there seems to be a problem at Halloween parties this year.

..
Posted by .. :: Nov 05 2008 at 13:22

---------------------------------
..
Posted by .. :: Nov 05 2008 at 13:22

Add a comment!

Wired is telling me to ditch my blog. Their argument is that Facebook and Flickr make it easier to do what I'm doing with my blog anyways. Now, I was never on the cutting edge of blogging. I didn't even have my livejournal until my junior year of college, which was 2002...about the middle of the bell curve for blogging 'taking off' and ancient history if I was really trying to be emo about things.

Now I'm not even the top result for "travis briggs" in Google, a statistic I prided myself on forever.

And why should I bother watching the World Series? I love watching the Red Sox, but I loathe watching other teams play. Especially when one of the teams is from the National League, a league that I spend the entire regular season ignoring. I'm simply not familiar with the players....not to mention that Fox coverage of baseball is only slightly above TBS's. Nothing beats the local broadcasters for local coverage of a baseball game.

But I'm probably just bitter because I don't have any friends to go to a bar and watch the game with...

flame bait
Posted by spavis :: Oct 23 2008 at 16:30

I've heard a lot of blogs refer to that article as flame bait. maybe going blogless works for some people but there's no killer combination of apps that'll completely replace the blog. ...yet

wired just wants the trackbacks. WHORES!

Add a comment!

There was a day in August, around the time of the 2008 Democratic National Convention, when I was approached by a man while we were both riding Boston's blue line. At the moment he approached me, I had been casually yet enthusiastically discussing some of the things about the convention- and, of course, Barack Obama's candidacy- that had me particularly excited.

The man had a worn face, and was wearing work clothes - a dirty hoody and scuffed jeans. It was clear he was a hard working man, presumably a member of the 'working class' that I keep hearing about. He approached me courteously yet assertively and asked simply "Do you think Obama can win it?"

I was secretly delighted to have a soapbox thus thrust underneath me. I first answered a resounding "YES!" to the man's leading question. The follow-up was the expected: "Why?" For that answer, I recall briefly and enthusiastically talking about minimum wage and health care, and how Barack Obama not only supports raising the levels of both, but has specific, well thought-out plans for doing so.

I hurriedly left the train at my stop, shaking the man's hand, surrounded by the grunts of approval and some disapproval of the patrons around me. It was an altogether electrifying moment, and it made me think "Yes, I could be a part of politics" and "Yes, I could do canvassing".

Since then I've lost a lot of enthusiasm for the campaign. It seems the television ads and the debates have boiled the Obama campaign, for me, down to a bunch of 'talking points'. And although I can recite many of them, I don't feel passionate about any of them. Obama is still my candidate, and I'm still going to vote for him if at all possible. But I'm not considering joining the Democratic party as much as I was a couple months ago. <sad_face/>

..
Posted by Eric Mill :: Oct 19 2008 at 10:05

Talking points and "messaging" are dehumanizing and dispiriting, and I share your complete lack of enthusiasm for them. But, I try to think of it as something that's not aimed at me, or you. Those talking points are for people who aren't already so convinced that they're shaking hands with people on the subway about it.

For people who have come this far and have yet to be convinced, they are either a.) researching the candidates on their own and in detail, making messaging less useful, or b.) are completely apathetic. And I don't know of *any* effective strategy to get through to people in class (b) - I guess talking points are the most effective, at least traditionally.

My point is not to pay attention to talking points anyway, because the campaign isn't trying to oversimplify themselves for you - they know that you already understand them in the complete and complex way that 30some% of the country does, Barack's unchangeable rock of support. The talking points are for somebody else.

Add a comment!

Dear boxoffail,

Thank you for performing an anonymous, unrequested security audit of my personal blog website. I appreciate the obvious thought and effort that went into your test cases/attack scenarios.

In the future, we would appreciate it if you contacted us in advance before performing any such audits. Although we here at boxofmonocles.com consider the security of our website and our customers' private data our highest priority, random, unannounced testing such as this is neither welcome nor helpful. As an esteemed member of the online security community yourself, I'm sure you understand that these sorts of activities, even when conducted in a "white hat" manner, can undermine our own security practices. Furthermore, your queries look strange and confusing to our legitimate users, and may give the false impression that we have been 'spammed' or 'compromised', even when no such breach has occurred.

We will further address this issue in the coming days.

Sincerely,
The boxofmonocles.com Security Team

Thanks guys, I couldn't agree more
Posted by T-$ :: Aug 29 2008 at 01:54

In addition to the points of ethics, pragmatism and basic courtesy that you brought up, I just wanted to point out that activities such as these may run afoul of anti-hacking laws in your jurisdiction.

Read all about it at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11470

...

And one more thing, on a more personal note. Box of fail, whoever the fuck you are [but I think that you're probably LW or BS from BC and I totally love and respect you guys with all my heart (aka, this post and this comment are both completely in good fun), similar to your 'security audit'. I wont DDoS you if you don't me. Besides, your servers are probably bigger :)], don't think I didn't realize that you were a real person and try to attribute this to 'zombie PCs in consumer households'. I know damn well that NO COMPUTER IN EXISTENCE (except maybe Deep Thought) could crack my CAPTCHAo'DOOM(tm). Clearly you're ONE SINGLE pimply, unemployed, Star Trek fan living in your parents' basement. Leave my website alone, bitches!


Add a comment!

Friend of a Friend Creative Commons License

This blog and all of its original content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike2.5 License. All other content is made available under the Fair Use laws of the United States of America.

Email Travis Briggs via whispr.